Have you ever wondered what you would do if someone placed a half-million-dollar check on your table, just for you to say a few nice words about a product? Sounds easy, right? But what if that product is AI—the very thing making millions of people fear losing their jobs, being replaced, and being deceived—then the story is entirely different.
That is precisely the situation thousands of content creators worldwide are facing. Tech giants like OpenAI, Google, Meta, and Anthropic are shelling out massive amounts of money to turn influencers into "brand ambassadors" for their AI tools. But behind those lucrative checks lies a harsh reality: their fans are furious.
Join me, SilverZ, having witnessed the marketing world turned upside down by money countless times over the past 20 years, as I dissect this battle between money and trust.
The Billion-Dollar War: How AI is Buying Influencers
Let's start with numbers that will leave you stunned.
According to data from the platform HypeAuditor, OpenAI doubled its sponsored Instagram posts promoting ChatGPT, going from 61 posts in June to 122 in July, and continuing to rise to 141 in August. They are building an "influencer army" to weave ChatGPT into every corner of life—from parenting and fitness to running a business.
But OpenAI isn't the only player in this game. Google and Microsoft have reportedly paid certain content creators anywhere from $400,000 to $600,000 for long-term contracts lasting several months. Anthropic is also spending heavily, even splashing millions on a 60-second Super Bowl ad directly targeting OpenAI's decision to display ads inside ChatGPT.
Amanda Acevedo, a talent manager at G&B Digital Management, revealed: "Out of the five inboxes I manage, every single day, at least 15 emails are from an AI company or some AI feature."
Natasha Badger, a marketing and tech content creator, calls this a "major battleground" among AI companies fighting for market share and working with as many influencers as possible.
Furious Fans: When "Money" Can't Buy "Trust"
But here is the interesting part. Those massive checks do not come with fan support. On the contrary, they often trigger a wave of severe criticism.
Remember OpenAI's "Summer Camp" event last summer? The company invited about 30 content creators to a luxury resort in rural New York, where they enjoyed farm-to-table dining, learned how to make honey, and posted on social media. Sounds like a dream.
Yet, the public's reaction was far from dreamy. One user commented: "Looks like an ideal location for a data center." Others called the event "dystopian" and "morally bankrupt."
Cliff Tan, an interior design content creator with millions of followers, became a target after posting sponsored content for Dreamina Seedance 2.5—ByteDance's AI tool. In the promotional video, he used the technology to turn an architectural drawing into a video. The result? Commenters split into two camps: some called it "disappointing" and threatened to unfollow, while others supported him.
Notably, the strongest backlash usually centers on image or video generation tools—technologies that many creators view as a direct threat to their artistic work. When AI can generate images and videos in seconds, creative professionals feel rightfully threatened.
AI Companies' Strategies: Buying Compliance with Money and "Safe Messaging"
Facing the backlash, AI companies are adjusting their strategies. They are not merely throwing money at influencers and hoping for the best. They are fine-tuning their messaging to mitigate risks.
Alisher Shariyazdanov, CEO of AI video startup Higgsfield, revealed that the company has compiled a list of "potentially hostile" topics based on sentiment analysis of creator comment sections. They then advise creators to avoid those topics. If a negative reaction occurs, they work together to understand the cause and figure out the next steps.
OpenAI is also shifting its approach. Instead of asking influencers to reassure the public that AI won't destroy humanity, they guide them to focus on how "cool" ChatGPT is or how it can support work that is "good for the world." The core message: AI is a useful tool, not a villain.
Badger, who partnered with OpenAI to promote ChatGPT Work, explained: "Most of the people following us already have ChatGPT. They don’t need to convert users. The goal is to keep people continuing to use ChatGPT as their default LLM."
Creators Caught in the Crossfire: Money or Trust?
This is the most agonizing question every content creator faces when receiving an offer from an AI company.
On one hand, the payout can reach five to seven figures—enough to change anyone's life. On the other hand, audience reputation and trust are a creator's most valuable assets. Once lost, they are extremely difficult to regain.
Ashton McGrady, who frequently talks to her audience about the moral and ethical reasons for using AI, shared: "I regularly tell my audience that there are moral and ethical reasons to use AI. When I do, it's from an accessibility standpoint." She noted that she rarely uses AI in her work, yet her content is still labeled as AI on social media platforms.
Lissette Calveiro, another creator, admitted: "It’s really hard to have a completely AI-free experience right now, no matter what industry you’re in."
Some creators have chosen to flatly reject offers from AI companies, even when the sums reach hundreds of thousands of dollars. They understand that audience trust cannot be bought with money.
Others choose to accept while remaining transparent. They openly tell their audience that the content is sponsored, explain why they agreed to cooperate, and strive to deliver genuine value rather than just reading provided scripts.
Lessons for the Vietnamese Market: When the AI Wave Arrives
You might think this story only happens in America, where AI companies pour billions of dollars into marketing. But look back at Vietnam.
Domestic and international tech companies are showing growing interest in the Vietnamese market. Vietnamese content creators—from YouTubers and TikTokers to Facebook KOLs—are targets of similar AI advertising campaigns. And lessons from the international market are entirely applicable.
1. Trust is the most valuable asset
Vietnamese audiences are increasingly savvy. They can distinguish between an honest review and disguised advertising. If you lose their trust, no amount of money can buy it back.
2. Transparency is key
If you decide to partner with an AI company, be upfront with your audience. Do not try to hide it. Transparency not only protects you but also builds long-term trust.
3. Choose products you genuinely believe in
Do not promote an AI tool you have never used or do not truly see value in. Audiences will spot the artificiality immediately.
4. Understand your audience
If your audience consists of creative professionals—artists, designers, musicians—promoting an AI tool that generates images and videos can feel like a betrayal. Understand your target demographic before accepting a partnership.
When Technology Challenges Ethics
I have witnessed the marketing industry go through quite a few revolutions. From the days of television advertising domination to the social media era, and now the AI wave. Every time, there are those who make a fortune and those who lose everything.
The difference this time is speed and scale. AI is not just a new product. It is a technological revolution changing how we work, create, and interact. And AI companies are trying to buy influencers to shape the narrative around that revolution.
But as I often say: money can buy attention, but it cannot buy respect. A content creator may earn hundreds of thousands of dollars from an AI advertising deal, but if fans turn their backs, that money is just an advance payment for a fading career.
The question is not "Is AI worth advertising?" The question is: "Are you willing to trade your audience's trust for money?" And that is a question every creator—in the US, Vietnam, or anywhere else—must answer for themselves.
If you are a content creator and receive a half-million-dollar offer to promote an AI tool that you know your audience fears, what would you do? Would you accept it and find a way to navigate the backlash, or would you flat-out refuse because audience trust is inviolable? Share your perspective below—because in this AI era, every creator's decision is shaping the future of an entire creative economy!
0 Comment
Add your comment to this article